ArticleBMJ open2026
Acute Rheumatic Fever Diagnostic Network (ARC Network) clinical recruitment protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRheumatic heart disease, a major cause of morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries, results from acute rheumatic fever (ARF), for which no diagnostic test currently exists. The ARF Diagnosis Collaborative Network (ARC Network) was established to address this gap by recruiting a rigorously phenotyped, globally representative cohort of children and adolescents with ARF and controls to support biomarker discovery. This paper describes the ARC Network's multicentre recruitment strategy and standardised procedures for classifying ARF cases and controls, enabling robust development of novel, accessible diagnostics. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ARC Network recruits children and adolescents aged 3-18 years with suspected ARF and matched controls across four countries. Clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic data are collected using standardised protocols. Echocardiographic and clinical core teams provide rigorous standardised case review. Biospecimens are processed locally following harmonised procedures and shipped to a central biobank for long-term storage and future biomarker studies. Centralised training, quality control and a research database ensure high-quality, globally representative data to support ARF biomarker discovery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ARC Network follows Institutional Review Board protocols with local ethical approval and informed consent, and oversees clinical data and biobank use for ARF research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.