ArticleBMJ open2026
Association between epidural analgesia experience and future fertility intention in China: a national cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the association between epidural analgesia (EDA) experience and subsequent fertility intention among reproductive-aged individuals with at least one child in China, and to examine whether this relationship varies by region and parity.
designThis nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted using multistage stratified and quota sampling across 148 cities in mainland China. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, generalised linear models and multinomial logistic regression (Mlogit).
settingCommunity-based data collection conducted across 148 cities in mainland China between 20 June and 31 August 2022.
participantsOf 21 872 respondents, 6349 reproductive-aged individuals (females aged 18-49 and males aged 18-65) with at least one child were included after applying standardised data quality criteria. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was self-rated fertility intention, operationalised as a continuous measure for regression analysis. The main exposure variable was prior experience with EDA during vaginal birth. Secondary analyses explored variations by region and number of children.
resultsEDA experience was positively associated with higher fertility intention (β=0.067, 95% CI 0.007 to 0.126, p=0.028). Female respondents reported lower fertility intention compared with males. Regionally, significant positive associations were observed in the central (relative risk ratio (RRR)=1.433, 95% CI 1.011 to 2.032, p=0.043) and western regions (RRR=1.505, 95% CI 1.070 to 2.117, p=0.019). Among women, EDA use was significantly associated with increased fertility intention in primigravida but not in multigravida participants.
conclusionsEDA use is positively associated with fertility intention among Chinese reproductive-aged individuals with children. Although this study identifies an association rather than a causal relationship-given the cross-sectional design-it highlights the potential value of improving awareness and access to labour pain management, especially in less developed regions, to better support informed reproductive decision-making and childbirth experiences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2200061046.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.