ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Knowledge of Pressure Ulcers Amongst Nurses and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pressure injury represents a significant but preventable health problem, especially in clinical settings characterised by a high degree of risk. Despite the critical role played by nurses in pressure injury prevention, evidence suggests that inconsistencies remain concerning their knowledge and skill levels. This study aimed to determine the level of knowledge amongst nurses regarding pressure injury prevention and the factors associated with this level. The sample of this cross-sectional study consisted of 346 nurses reached through convenience sampling. The research data were collected online using the nurse descriptive form and the Pieper-Zulkowski Pressure Injury Knowledge Test, accessed through a Google Forms link shared on various social media platforms between December 2023 and February 2025. Most of the 346 nurses who participated in the study were female (89.0%), and the mean age was 36.19 years (±8.52 years). Most participants had a bachelor's degree (76.8%), and 35.6% had more than 20 years of professional experience. The pressure injury knowledge test score of the nurses was 43.00 (10.50). There was a significant difference in knowledge scores between clinical units (p = 0.009); the highest scores were found in nurses working in high-risk units (e.g., operating theatre) (p = 0.029). The study demonstrated that the implementation of unit-specific, practise-based training programmes is imperative to enhance nurses' knowledge. It is suggested that future studies utilise a combination of methods in order to address the individual, environmental and organisational factors that have a bearing on knowledge levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.