ArticleRMD open2026
Real-world safety assessment of avacopan in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.
Article in RMD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePostmarketing safety data of avacopan, the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug in a decade for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV), are currently limited. This study aims to conduct a comprehensive real-world evaluation of its adverse events (AEs).
methodsThe FDA Adverse Event Reporting System was comprehensively reviewed and analysed. Disproportionality analysis was conducted to evaluate the significance of avacopan-related AEs at both system organ class (SOC) and preferred terms (PTs) levels. Time-to-onset (TTO), Weibull shape parameter (WSP) analysis and cumulative incidence analyses were performed to explore the temporal patterns of AE occurrence. Additionally, subgroup analyses based on gender and age were undertaken.
resultsA total of 3150 reports of avacopan-related AEs were identified. 8 positive SOC signals and 92 positive PT signals were detected, including 34 previously unrecognised PTs. None was classified as a high clinical priority. The median TTO was 48 days. Overall WSP analyses suggested an early failure type pattern, while event-specific analyses demonstrated heterogeneous temporal patterns. Patients aged≥65 years had a higher cumulative incidence of AEs. Hepatobiliary events were the leading ones, with a predominance of reports involving female and geriatric (≥65 years) patients.
conclusionAvacopan demonstrated a favourable safety profile in patients with AAV in real-world settings. The overall AE risk increased with age, while hepatobiliary events were particularly more frequent among geriatric and female patients. Our study uncovered previously unrecognised AEs as well. These findings highlighted the need for risk-informed and AE-specific monitoring strategies to support individualised management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.