Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41881235›Full record

ArticleContraception2026

Reasons for contraceptive nonuse at two sites in Burkina Faso.

Leigh Senderowicz, Emma Romell, Brooke W Bullington, Nathalie Sawadogo, Katherine Tumlinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leigh SenderowiczDepartment of Gender and Women's Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States. Electronic address: senderowicz@wisc.edu.
Emma RomellCenter for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Leverhulme Center for Demographic Science, Demographic Science Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Brooke W BullingtonDivision of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Nathalie SawadogoInstitut Supérieur des Sciences de la Population, Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Katherine TumlinsonDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Health, Chapel Hill, NC, United States; Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Health Disparities Research Scholars Training Program-RenewalT32HD049302 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Maureen S Durkin · 2007 to 2026
$5.6M
Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD047873 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Katherine J. Curtis · 2014 to 2026
$5.1M
Research Training Program in Reproductive and Sexual HealthR25HD115514 · NICHD · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JESSICA N SANDERS, David Turok · 2024 to 2026
$474k
Contraceptive Autonomy: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Developing a Novel Family Planning MeasureK01HD113818 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Leigh Gabrielle Senderowicz · 2024 to 2026
$411k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD113818NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047873NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD115514NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD049302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe examine reasons for contraceptive nonuse in Burkina Faso. STUDY

designWe draw from a population-based survey of 3929 women, of whom 2462 were nonusers of contraception. We use descriptive statistics to examine the distribution of reasons for nonuse.

resultsOver 80% of respondents reported lack of desire or need for contraception as motivating nonuse. Conventional access barriers, like cost or distance, were uncommon.

conclusionsRestricted access to contraception was not a commonly reported barrier to contraceptive use in this context. IMPLICATIONS: Sexual and reproductive health researchers should avoid assuming that nonusers lack contraceptive access. Future research should explore further reasons for contraceptive nonuse.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraception BehaviorAdolescentAdultBurkina FasoFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansYoung AdultBurkina FasoContraceptive nonuseContraceptive useSub-Saharan AfricaUnmet need

Identifiers

PMID41881235
PMCPMC13213175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.