ReviewAnatomical sciences education2026
Development of effective 3D digital models for first-time learners of musculoskeletal anatomy.
Review in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musculoskeletal anatomy is a critical component of allied health curricula. With the ubiquity of technology in the classroom and the recent COVID-19 pandemic creating accessibility barriers for students, there is a need for viable digital resources to enhance learning by supplementing traditional textbook studying. This article describes the creation of an annotated, interactive, three-dimensional digital model and presents preliminary data on its effectiveness for students learning musculoskeletal structures of the hip and knee for the first time. The 3D model was developed in Blender using open-source files and was uploaded to the Sketchfab platform. Eighty-one students in the musculoskeletal anatomy course at a large midwestern university took an assessment to measure their baseline anatomical knowledge, studied the testable structures from either the model or textbook images for 10 min, and took a follow-up assessment. Students in the 3D Model Group saw greater increases from their baseline scores and also reported higher confidence in what they had learned, increased ability to visualize anatomical structures, and greater enjoyment of their resource than students who used textbook images. The findings presented here suggest that creating effective, accessible 3D digital resources is feasible for educators without training in technology-related fields and that having access to these resources can be beneficial to first-time learners of anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.