ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2026
Precise Mechanochemical Scission of DNA Guided by Secondary Structures.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA has recently been exploited as a biopolymer, enabling sequence-specific, mechanophore-free mechanochemistry with few-nucleotide-precision scission and monomer-level analysis of breakage. Strategically positioned nicks in double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) have previously been shown to act as mechanophores, concentrating force on the non-nicked strand opposite each nick to induce localized scission; however, base fraying inherently limits this precision. To address this, we identify, for the first time, the potential of DNA hairpins to serve as 'biomechanophores' and direct precise mechanochemical scission of DNA. Using a dsDNA construct containing a centrally embedded hairpin motif, we show that ultrasonication induces cleavage regioselectively opposite the hairpin loop. Force localization around nucleotides on the nonhairpin strand was rationalized by all-atom, constant-force molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of sonicated fragments revealed a narrow, well-defined scission distribution on the nonhairpin strand, in contrast to a much broader, bimodal-like distribution on the hairpin strand. Together with the simulations, these results support a two-step cleavage mechanism. Our findings establish DNA hairpins as the first functional biomechanophores capable of directing mechanically induced strand scission with high spatial precision, expanding the mechanochemical toolbox for nucleic acid manipulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.