ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Segmentation of Three Oral Diseases: Enabling Precision Diagnosis and Decision Support.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor on Artificial Intelligence-Driven Segmentation of 3 Oral Diseases.International dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe advancement of AI-assisted oral disease diagnosis critically relies on the availability of annotated, high-quality datasets and resilient deep learning architectures. Nevertheless, progress in this domain has been impeded by the scarcity of publicly accessible data and inadequate benchmarking of existing models. To address these limitations, we introduced a meticulously curated dataset encompassing three prevalent oral mucosal diseases and undertook a thorough assessment of five deep learning models, focusing on their performance in concurrent lesion segmentation and classification.
methodsThis study involved the compilation of a dataset comprising 808 high-resolution clinical images, encompassing three distinct oral mucosal pathologies: oral lichen planus, oral leukoplakia, and oral benign ulcers. Data collections were facilitated through clinical practices, and the images were subsequently annotated by three oral medicine specialists, who provided both diagnostic labels and pixel-level segmentation masks. To ascertain the dataset's utility and efficacy, five sophisticated deep learning architectures were benchmarked for their capacity to perform simultaneous segmentation and classification tasks.
resultsOur benchmark evaluation indicated robust model performance on the proposed dataset. For the task of lesion segmentation, the optimal model achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.768 ± 0.031. Concurrently, an accuracy of 0.940 ± 0.013 was attained for disease classification. These findings collectively affirmed the dataset's substantial suitability for the development and rigorous assessment of AI models within authentic diagnostic contexts.
conclusionThe proposed dataset presented a standardised benchmark to facilitate the advancement of AI development in dental applications. Combined with rigorous deep learning validation, we provided a reproducible framework for precise lesion localisation and accurate disease identification. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The proposed integrated dataset-model pipeline facilitates the development of dependable AI tools capable of aiding clinicians in prompt diagnosis, mitigating diagnostic inconsistencies, and augmenting decision-making processes within standard oral health care practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.