Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41880827›Full record

ArticleInternational dental journal2026

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Segmentation of Three Oral Diseases: Enabling Precision Diagnosis and Decision Support.

Baowen Cheng, Meijuan Xiang, Zhuofan Zhao, Xiaodong Zhang, Yu-Feng Wang, Shuyun Ge, Fang Zhao, Meng Li, Haiyan Wang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Baowen ChengShanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, China.
Meijuan XiangShanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China.
Zhuofan ZhaoShanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, China.
Xiaodong ZhangNXP Semiconductor, Shanghai (Tech Park Office), Shanghai, 201203, China.
Yu-Feng WangDepartment of Oral Medicine, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200050, China.
Shuyun GeDepartment of Oral Medicine, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200050, China.
Fang ZhaoDiFint Technology (Shanghai) Co, Shanghai, China; The INSIDE Institute for Biological and Artificial Intelligence, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: zhaofang@difint.cn.
Meng LiShanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200050, China; Guangdong-Hong kong-Maco Greater Bay Area Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China; College of Intelligent System Science and Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin, 150001, China. Electronic address: limeng.braindecoder@gmail.com.
Haiyan WangShanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China. Electronic address: shzyyykqk@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe advancement of AI-assisted oral disease diagnosis critically relies on the availability of annotated, high-quality datasets and resilient deep learning architectures. Nevertheless, progress in this domain has been impeded by the scarcity of publicly accessible data and inadequate benchmarking of existing models. To address these limitations, we introduced a meticulously curated dataset encompassing three prevalent oral mucosal diseases and undertook a thorough assessment of five deep learning models, focusing on their performance in concurrent lesion segmentation and classification.

methodsThis study involved the compilation of a dataset comprising 808 high-resolution clinical images, encompassing three distinct oral mucosal pathologies: oral lichen planus, oral leukoplakia, and oral benign ulcers. Data collections were facilitated through clinical practices, and the images were subsequently annotated by three oral medicine specialists, who provided both diagnostic labels and pixel-level segmentation masks. To ascertain the dataset's utility and efficacy, five sophisticated deep learning architectures were benchmarked for their capacity to perform simultaneous segmentation and classification tasks.

resultsOur benchmark evaluation indicated robust model performance on the proposed dataset. For the task of lesion segmentation, the optimal model achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.768 ± 0.031. Concurrently, an accuracy of 0.940 ± 0.013 was attained for disease classification. These findings collectively affirmed the dataset's substantial suitability for the development and rigorous assessment of AI models within authentic diagnostic contexts.

conclusionThe proposed dataset presented a standardised benchmark to facilitate the advancement of AI development in dental applications. Combined with rigorous deep learning validation, we provided a reproducible framework for precise lesion localisation and accurate disease identification. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The proposed integrated dataset-model pipeline facilitates the development of dependable AI tools capable of aiding clinicians in prompt diagnosis, mitigating diagnostic inconsistencies, and augmenting decision-making processes within standard oral health care practices.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDecision Support TechniquesDeep LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedLeukoplakia, OralLichen Planus, OralMouth DiseasesOral UlcerHumansArtificial intelligenceBenchmark evaluationClinical imaging datasetDeep learningOral diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID41880827
PMCPMC13052149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.