Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41880761›Full record

ArticlePlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2026

Resilience of floral scent emission after florivory.

P Tunes, Y Canaveze, S R Machado, S Dötterl, E Guimarães

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

P TunesGraduate Program in Plant Biology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5521-5418
Y CanavezeDepartment of Botany, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7516-9845
S R MachadoElectron Microscopy Center of the Institute of Biosciences of Botucatu, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
S DötterlDepartment of Environment & Biodiversity, Plant Ecology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
E GuimarãesLaboratory of Ecology and Evolution of Plant-Animal Interactions, Department of Biodiversity and Biostatistics, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1006-357X

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 308982/2020-7Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 312799/2021-7Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior PDSE #88882.433249/2018-01Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo #2009/17611-7Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo #2018/14146-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo #2021/10639-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo #2021/13392-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout evolutionary time, florivory has always represented an important source of selective pressure on flower evolution. When feeding, florivores remove corolla portions and undoubtedly change floral visual traits; however, we are in the early stages of understanding the effects of florivory on floral olfactory signalling. Florivores may jeopardize floral scent emission by feeding on flower parts responsible for volatile synthesis/emission, or by inducing plant physiological responses that alter floral scent. Thus, after florivory, flowers may no longer attract pollinators or might even repel them due to local short-term changes in floral scent emission. Here, we investigate whether damage by florivores alters the amount and composition of floral scent. We describe natural florivory patterns and anatomically characterize the corolla portions potentially involved in scent emission in seven plant species pollinated by bees, hummingbirds, hawkmoths, or butterflies, which have diverse florivores, in a neotropical savanna. Moreover, we performed natural experiments to test whether florivory leads to short-term local changes in floral scent phenotype. We found that even when florivores consumed 15% of the corolla portions with anatomical scent-emitting features, there was no reduction in total amount of floral scent, except in a hawkmoth-pollinated species, which showed a reduction in scent emission although only 3% of the osmophore-bearing areas were consumed. Florivory did not affect scent composition in any species. Our data suggest a stability in post-florivory scent emission, which may guarantee the maintenance of pollinator visitation regardless of florivory, indicating a resilience of natural systems with multiple and simultaneous interactions.

Indexed as

FlowersOdorantsAnimalsBeesBirdsButterfliesMothsPollinationVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic CompoundsChemical signallingflorivoryflorivory‐induced chemical responseosmophorespollinationvolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID41880761
PMCPMC13358683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.