ReviewAnnual review of biochemistry2026
The Human Autophagy Core Complexes.
Review in Annual review of biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- PI3KC3/BECLIN1-dependent lipophagy mediates phosphorus-induced reduction of hepatic lipid deposition in hybrid yellow catfish.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2026Article
- Reconstitution of multistep recruitment of ULK1 to membranes in autophagy.Science advances · 2026Article
- PFAS Exposure and Metabolic Disorders: Mechanistic Insights into Lipid and Glucose Homeostasis.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Article
- Spatial confinement shapes organelle architecture and remodeling in axons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Small bites for big problems: stepwise aggregate degradation by autophagy.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
- The primary cilium-autophagy axis in vascular homeostasis and cardiovascular disease: mechanistic crosstalk and evidence boundaries.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Silent controllers: non-coding RNAs drive autophagic response in myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The autophagy core machinery carries out the fundamental reactions of autophagosome biogenesis across all forms of bulk and selective macroautophagy. In humans, the core complexes consist of the ULK1 complex (ULK1C), the class III phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase complex I (PI3KC3-C1), the ATG8 proteins and the ATG8ylation machinery, the phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI3P)-sensing WIPI proteins, the lipid transporter ATG2, and the lipid scramblase and initiation scaffold ATG9. These complexes form a web of interactions that can be initiated by clustering of the FIP200 subunit of ULK1C but also by PI3KC3-C1 or WIPI2. Upon autophagy induction, these interactions are intensified by feed-forward signaling loops. These loops are amplified by WIPI-PI3P interactions and the conjugation of ATG8 proteins to the membrane by the ATG12-ATG5-ATG16L1 complex. Autophagosomes are seeded by ATG9 vesicles, which accrue initiation machinery on their surface and dock onto a PI3P-positive domain of the endoplasmic reticulum known as the omegasome. The omegasome contact site is the focal point for autophagosome growth, which is fed by lipid transport through the ATG2 bridge-like lipid transporter. The core complexes function in a dynamic manner, which makes autophagy vulnerable to stalling when dynamism fails. Disassembly and dissociation of the machinery, which is promoted at least in part by ULK1, is likely to be as important as assembly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.