ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Neural signatures of human psychological resilience driven by acute stress.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural signatures of human psychological resilience driven by acute stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Gamma and Psychological Resilience: Where to Now?Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying psychological resilience-the ability to overcome adversity-have been extensively studied in animals. However, compared to that in animals, human resilience is unique in that it is underpinned by higher-order cognitive functions, such as self-confidence, tenacity, and a positive attitude to challenges. Given these discrepancies, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying human-specific resilience remain unclear. To address this issue, we aimed to record multimodal responses after acute stress exposure over 1.5 h using functional brain imaging and peripheral physiological measurements. We showed that the degree of individual resilience is indexed by multiple changes in neural dynamics 1 h after acute stress. Functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography show that activity in the cortical salience network and power in high-beta and gamma oscillations increase in less resilient individuals. Contrastingly, activity in the cortical default mode network and spontaneous activity in the posterior hippocampus increase in more resilient individuals. Machine learning analysis confirmed that, 1 h after stress exposure, the functional connectivity in the salience network was the most influential, followed by that in the default mode network, gamma power, high-beta power, and hippocampal activity. The neurophysiological dynamics for resilience do not occur as previously thought, but rather in a time-lagged manner against stress exposure. Our findings shed light on an approach to recovery from stress-induced deficits such as delayed neuromodulation after a stressful event.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.