SynthesisSurgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques2026
The Cost-Effectiveness of Conservatively Managed Acute Appendicitis Versus Appendicectomy: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAppendicectomy remains the gold standard treatment for acute appendicitis. While there is continued debate as to the clinical benefit of conservative treatment in acute appendicitis, the cost-effectiveness of each treatment is a critical consideration. The aim of this study is to evaluate the current health economic evidence for surgery versus conservative management in acute appendicitis.
methodsA systematic literature search of 3 online databases for evidence pertaining to the economics of appendectomy compared with conservative management was performed according to PRISMA standards. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (study ID: CRD42023412691).
resultsA total of 1219 patients were included (639 operative treatment vs. 580 conservative management). A total of 5 studies were included. Surgery was significantly more expensive when compared with conservative treatment (16.5% to 83.0%) percentage cost difference. The average length of hospitalisation was similar between the groups. The majority of studies reported a 12-month follow-up. The CHEERS assessment revealed a considerable risk of bias.
conclusionConservative management of appendicitis is the more economically effective treatment of the 2 modalities. This is an important consideration for resource-limited health care systems. However, further research with standardized methodologies and longer-term follow-up is warranted to fully assess the economic implications and clinical effectiveness of both treatment approaches. KEY STATEMENT: Analysis indicates conservative management as the economically preferable option for acute appendicitis over surgery. This finding underscores its potential significance for resource-constrained health care systems. However, standardized studies with extended follow-up in different global health care settings are required to evaluate the economic and clinical merits of both treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.