Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41880477›Full record

ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2026

Effects of exposure to Rickettsia bellii on reservoir competence of guinea pigs for Rickettsia rickettsii

Lina de Campos Binder, Carlos Eduardo Camargo Fanchini, Herbert Sousa Soares, Talita Beck Strabelli Dos Santos, Sueli Akemi Taniwaki, Marcelly Bastos Nassar, Andrea Cristina Fogaça, Maria Carolina de Azevedo Serpa, Matheus Pasini Martins, Marcelo Bahia Labruna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lina de Campos BinderUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2136-7149
Carlos Eduardo Camargo FanchiniUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Herbert Sousa SoaresUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Talita Beck Strabelli Dos SantosUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Sueli Akemi TaniwakiUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Marcelly Bastos NassarUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Parasitologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Andrea Cristina FogaçaUniversidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Departamento de Parasitologia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Maria Carolina de Azevedo SerpaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Matheus Pasini MartinsUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Marcelo Bahia LabrunaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmblyomma sculptum is the main vector implicated in the transmission of Rickettsia rickettsii in southeastern Brazil, where capybaras are known to be the main amplifying hosts of this pathogen. Interestingly, many areas inhabited by large populations of capybaras and A. sculptum remain free of R. rickettsii, suggesting that other drivers may be involved in the pathogen perpetuation. A. sculptum frequently occurs in sympatry with Amblyomma dubitatum ticks, sharing the same hosts with them. Considering that A. dubitatum ticks are frequently infected with Rickettsia bellii, a possible interference of R. bellii in the reservoir competence of capybaras for R. rickettsii could explain the heterogeneous distribution of R. rickettsii in A. sculptum populations in southeastern Brazil.

objectivesThe present study aimed to evaluate the effect of primary exposure to R. bellii-infected A. dubitatum on the reservoir competence for R. rickettsii using guinea pigs as experimental models.

methodsThree guinea pigs were infested with R. bellii-infected A. dubitatum (Group GB), four guinea pigs with uninfected A. dubitatum (Group GD), and three guinea pigs were not exposed to A. dubitatum (Group GC). After infestation with A. dubitatum, all guinea pigs were exposed to one single R. rickettsii-infected A. sculptum female and then were infested with uninfected A. sculptum larvae. After ecdysis, nymphs were tested for detection of spotted fever group rickettsiae.

findingsFive out of six guinea pigs from GD and GC groups died, while one out of three guinea pigs in the GB group had a fatal outcome. R. rickettsii infection rate among ticks fed on animals from GB group was 21% (17/80), significantly lower than the rate of 54% (60/111) recorded in ticks fed on animals from GD and GC groups. MAIN

conclusionsPrior exposure of guinea pigs to R. bellii-infected A. dubitatum ticks reduced their reservoir competence for R. rickettsii.

Indexed as

AmblyommaArachnid VectorsDisease ReservoirsRickettsiaRickettsia rickettsiiAnimalsBrazilFemaleGuinea PigsMaleRocky Mountain Spotted Fever

Identifiers

PMID41880477
PMCPMC13008364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.