Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41880375›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Agilik@home: A randomized controlled trial protocol to evaluate the effects of home-based training with the Agilik powered KAFO in children with cerebral palsy and crouch gait.

Roberta Nossa, Fabio Alexander Storm, Eleonora Diella, Riccardo Riboni, Luca Emanuele Molteni, Mattia Chiappini, Cristina Maghini, Elena Beretta, Roberta Nicotra, Sara Abbondio and 16 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06622655 (Agilik@Home), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06622655 narecruitingnot on this map

Agilik@Home: Demonstrate the Clinical Improvement Due to the Home Use of Agilik in Children With Cerebral Palsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS Eugenio MedeaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsCerebral Palsy (CP)ArmsPowered orthosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Roberta NossaScientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini (LC), Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-2327
Fabio Alexander StormScientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini (LC), Italy.
Eleonora DiellaScientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini (LC), Italy.
Riccardo RiboniScientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini (LC), Italy.
Luca Emanuele MolteniScientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini (LC), Italy.
Mattia ChiappiniScientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini (LC), Italy.
Cristina MaghiniScientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini (LC), Italy.
Elena BerettaScientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini (LC), Italy.
Roberta NicotraChild Neuropsychiatry Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Sara AbbondioChild Neuropsychiatry Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1273-2006
Carolina FerranteDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy.
Annalisa CotardoDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy.
Giada SgherriDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy.
Marco GermanottaIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Firenze, Italy.
Maria Cristina MauroIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Firenze, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1182-2869
Alessio FasanoIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Firenze, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7919-5768
Carlotta CordoniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Firenze, Italy.
Maurizio FerrarinIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7797-2399
Anna CavalliniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milano, Italy.
Sabrina Giovanna SignoriniChild Neuropsychiatry Unit, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Giuseppina SgandurraDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, Pisa, Italy.
Irene AprileIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Firenze, Italy.
Laura IuvoneIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Firenze, Italy.
Angela CavalagliIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milano, Italy.
Emilia BiffiScientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini (LC), Italy.
Agilik@home Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebral palsy (CP) is the most common neuromotor disability in children and often results in spastic diplegia, which can lead to crouch gait. This gait pattern, resulting from weakness predominantly in the extensor muscles and spasticity mainly affecting the flexors, is characterized by excessive knee flexion, insufficient hip extension, and excessive ankle dorsiflexion, which together can progressively impair walking. The Agilik powered knee-ankle-foot orthosis is designed to enhance knee extension and potentially improve gait in children with CP. Here we present the protocol of a study that aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of Agilik in a domiciliary setting.

methodsAccording to this protocol, the multicentre randomized controlled trial will enrol 40 children with CP (aged 5-17 years) exhibiting crouch gait. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the Intervention Group, which will receive training with the Agilik device, or the Control Group, which will maintain their standard routines and therapies. All participants will undergo physical examination and baseline assessments. Then, while the Control Group continues the usual care, the Intervention Group will begin the Agilik program, including three device fitting visits, 4/5 weeks of hospital training, and two months of home-based sessions. Both groups will be evaluated at three time points: baseline, after the intervention, and at a one-month follow-up. Primary endpoints include the 6-Minute Walking Test and Knee Extension in Mid-Stance computed during gait analysis. Secondary endpoints assess gross-motor abilities, gait speed, 3D gait analysis with electromyography, joint range of motion, muscle length, self-perceived performance, spasticity, and balance. Additionally, the Intervention Group will provide feedback on the usability and acceptability of the device, and on cognitive, behavioural and affective engagement. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of the Agilik device in children with CP and crouch gait. It will help emphasizing the potential benefits of the device on daily living activities and gait performance. The findings could influence clinical practice and guide future interventions for managing crouch gait in CP, potentially leading to enhanced quality of life for these children.

trial registrationThe trial has been registered the 30th September 2024 on ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT06622655.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyExercise TherapyGaitGait Disorders, NeurologicAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularWalking

Identifiers

PMID41880375
PMCPMC13016275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.