Observational studyPloS one2026
Examining women's choice between home and institutional births: Insights from the Salud Mesoamérica Initiative (SMI).
Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines women's childbirth choices between home and institutional settings in the context of the Salud Mesoamérica Initiative, a results-based financing program focused on disadvantaged populations. This study characterizes the childbirth experience using the World Health Organization's Positive Childbirth Experience framework, identifies factors influencing women's decisions for home versus institutional births, and describes reasons for transitions between these settings, especially for women with multiple pregnancies. A retrospective observational study was carried out using secondary data from household surveys carried out in Guatemala, Chiapas (Mexico), Nicaragua, and Honduras. A two-stage random sample of women (15-49 years) who had a live birth within five years preceding the surveys was analyzed. Quality of institutional care and reasons for home birth were categorized into specific domains and data across three follow-up points were analyzed using design-adjusted chi-squared tests (Rao-Scott correction). Finally, for the second follow-up, a sub-analysis explored setting transitions for women with multiple pregnancies. The main results indicate that Guatemala had the highest rate of home births (83.8%), while institutional deliveries were more common in Honduras and Nicaragua. Over time, institutional births increased across the board, notably in Honduras, where they surged from 72.3% to 92.7%. The primary factors influencing birth setting choices were accessibility and cultural preferences, with the latter being particularly significant in Guatemala and Chiapas. The results underscore the critical need for culturally sensitive strategies to boost institutional birth rates. While enhanced accessibility has contributed to more institutional deliveries, deep-seated cultural preferences remain a considerable hurdle. Interventions that respect local beliefs while simultaneously improving the quality of care in institutional settings are essential to ensure safe childbirth for all women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.