ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluation of Ascophyllum nodosum extract supplementation on feed degradability, ruminal fermentation and methane production using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC).
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of liquid Ascophyllum nodosum (ASC) extracts on feed degradability, ruminal fermentation, total gas and methane (CH4) production using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC). Two experiments were conducted: Experiment 1 assessed a grass-based diet with an ASC extract included at 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% of dry matter (DM), while Experiment 2 evaluated a grass silage-based diet with an ASC extract included at 0.3%, 0.4% and 0.5% of DM. Both diets included a control treatment (CTR; no seaweed extract). In Experiment 1, the 0.3% treatment reduced CH4 production relative to CTR, primarily by decreasing nutrient degradation and total volatile fatty acid production, resulting in reductions of 20% for total gas, 34% for CH4 (mmol/d) and 30% for CH4 (mmol/g of digestible organic matter; DOM). Metabolic hydrogen produced and incorporated were also reduced. In Experiment 2, the 0.5% treatment decreased DM and organic matter degradation compared to CTR, with no effects on crude protein or neutral detergent fibre degradation, or rumen fermentation parameters. Despite this, all ASC extract treatments reduced total gas by 20-24%, CH4 (mmol/d) by 23-26% and CH4 (mmol/g DOM) by 21-29% relative to CTR. Metabolic hydrogen recovery decreased by 22% across all ASC extract treatments, suggesting other mechanisms were at play redirecting hydrogen away from methanogenesis. These findings highlight the potential of ASC extract as a natural CH4-mitigating feed additive under controlled fermentation conditions, supporting the development of more sustainable ruminant production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.