Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41880311›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Evaluation of Ascophyllum nodosum extract supplementation on feed degradability, ruminal fermentation and methane production using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC).

Aaron Casey, Tommy M Boland, Alan K Kelly, Zoe C McKay, Maria Markiewicz-Keszycka, Armin Mirzapour-Koudash, Marco Garcia-Vaquero, Sivaprakash Balakrishnan, Kieran J Guinan, John T O'Sullivan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aaron CaseySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5958-2752
Tommy M BolandSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Alan K KellySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Zoe C McKaySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Maria Markiewicz-KeszyckaSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Armin Mirzapour-KoudashSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Marco Garcia-VaqueroSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Sivaprakash BalakrishnanBioAtlantis Ltd, Clash Industrial Estate, Tralee, Co. Kerry, Ireland.
Kieran J GuinanBioAtlantis Ltd, Clash Industrial Estate, Tralee, Co. Kerry, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-0927
John T O'SullivanBioAtlantis Ltd, Clash Industrial Estate, Tralee, Co. Kerry, Ireland.
Stafford VigorsSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9304-2925

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of liquid Ascophyllum nodosum (ASC) extracts on feed degradability, ruminal fermentation, total gas and methane (CH4) production using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC). Two experiments were conducted: Experiment 1 assessed a grass-based diet with an ASC extract included at 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% of dry matter (DM), while Experiment 2 evaluated a grass silage-based diet with an ASC extract included at 0.3%, 0.4% and 0.5% of DM. Both diets included a control treatment (CTR; no seaweed extract). In Experiment 1, the 0.3% treatment reduced CH4 production relative to CTR, primarily by decreasing nutrient degradation and total volatile fatty acid production, resulting in reductions of 20% for total gas, 34% for CH4 (mmol/d) and 30% for CH4 (mmol/g of digestible organic matter; DOM). Metabolic hydrogen produced and incorporated were also reduced. In Experiment 2, the 0.5% treatment decreased DM and organic matter degradation compared to CTR, with no effects on crude protein or neutral detergent fibre degradation, or rumen fermentation parameters. Despite this, all ASC extract treatments reduced total gas by 20-24%, CH4 (mmol/d) by 23-26% and CH4 (mmol/g DOM) by 21-29% relative to CTR. Metabolic hydrogen recovery decreased by 22% across all ASC extract treatments, suggesting other mechanisms were at play redirecting hydrogen away from methanogenesis. These findings highlight the potential of ASC extract as a natural CH4-mitigating feed additive under controlled fermentation conditions, supporting the development of more sustainable ruminant production systems.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAscophyllumDietary SupplementsFermentationMethanePlant ExtractsRumenAnimalsDigestionMethanePlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID41880311
PMCPMC13016304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.