Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41880291›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Habitat use of Bechstein´s bats (Myotis bechsteinii) within wind parks in forests.

Johanna Hurst, Fränzi Korner-Nievergelt, Robert Brinkmann

Expression of concernAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johanna HurstFreiburg Institute of Applied Animal Ecology, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6915-0262
Fränzi Korner-NievergeltLandscape Ecology and Ecosystem Conservation, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Robert BrinkmannFreiburg Institute of Applied Animal Ecology, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wind parks are increasingly installed at forest sites, which are a sensitive habitat for bats. As a consequence forest habitats are disturbed and altered by logging, edge effects and turbine operation noises. The Bechstein´s bat (Myotis bechsteinii) is highly dependent on forest habitats for roosting and foraging. We analysed the habitat use of breeding colonies of Bechstein's bats in two wind parks. Over four years, we radio-tracked 31 individuals and identified their maternity roosts and foraging areas. We analysed the influence of the turbines on their habitat use, and the effect of wind speed and rotor blade rotation on the distance of the bats to the turbines. The colonies occupied tree roosts, a few hundred meters from the wind turbines. Foraging habitats close to the turbines were used preferably, when bats were close to the maternity roosts. The vegetation in these areas comprised of large trees and little shrub and herb layer coverage, indicating a high quality foraging habitat. The distance of the foraging bats to the turbines increased with increasing rotor blade rotation at high wind speeds. The results show that Bechstein´s bats become more selective in their habitat use, the closer they are to the wind turbines. Close to their maternity roosts, the advantages of a high quality habitat outweighed the disturbance effects and bats still used roosts and surrounding foraging habitats, despite turbine presence nearby. However, when further away from their roosts they avoided foraging close to wind turbines. With careful site planning, which excludes sensitive forest habitats, combined with restricted turbine operation times in summer, the negative effects of disturbances from wind turbines could be mitigated or avoided for maternity colonies of Bechstein's bats.

Indexed as

ChiropteraEcosystemForestsWindAnimals

Identifiers

PMID41880291
PMCPMC13016307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.