Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41880290›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Validation of the moral foundations questionnaire-2 (MFQ-2) in Germany: Psychometric properties and associations with political ideology, religiosity, and personality.

Nico S Musa, Sarah M Müller, Frederic R Hopp

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nico S MusaLeibniz-Institute for Psychology (ZPID), Trier, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7685-4877
Sarah M MüllerLeibniz-Institute for Psychology (ZPID), Trier, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.
Frederic R HoppLeibniz-Institute for Psychology (ZPID), Trier, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-064X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-cultural moral psychology requires robust, validated measures. The Moral Foundations Questionnaire-2 (MFQ-2) is a recent revision of the original MFQ that offers improved assessment of moral intuitions; however, a validated German version is unavailable, limiting moral psychology research in German-speaking populations. This Stage 1 Registered Report Protocol describes the methodology for developing and psychometrically validating a German version of the MFQ-2, with a target sample size of N ≈ 1,200. Its primary aim is to assess the instrument's factor structure using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling/Confirmatory Factor Analysis, reliability and measurement invariance. A secondary aim is to provide initial construct validity by examining associations with psycho-social correlates, including political ideology, religiosity, personality, and ethics positions. We will test whether theoretically predicted patterns emerge in the German context. By providing a methodologically validated tool, this research will enable investigation of moral belief structures in German-speaking countries and facilitate cross-cultural comparisons in moral psychological science.

Indexed as

MoralsPersonalityPoliticsPsychometricsCross-Cultural ComparisonGermanyHumansReligionReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41880290
PMCPMC13016328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.