ArticlePloS one2026
Social support detection from social media texts.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The effect of social media use on employment anxiety of college students: the mediating role of social support.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social support, conveyed through a multitude of interactions and platforms such as social media, plays a pivotal role in fostering a sense of belonging, aiding resilience in the face of challenges, and enhancing overall well-being. This paper introduces Social Support Detection (SSD) as a Natural Language Processing (NLP) task aimed at identifying supportive interactions within online communities. We define SSD through three subtasks: (1) binary classification of whether a comment expresses social support or not social support, (2) binary classification of the intended support target (individual or group), and (3) multiclass classification of the specific group being supported, including Nation, Other, LGBTQ, Black Community, Religion, and Women. We conducted experiments on a manually annotated dataset of 9,998 YouTube comments. Traditional machine learning models were employed using various combinations of linguistic, psycholinguistic, emotional, and sentiment-based features. Additionally, neural network-based models incorporating word embeddings were evaluated to enhance performance across the subtasks. The results indicate a prevalence of group-oriented support in online discourse, highlighting broader societal dynamics. The findings show that integrating psycholinguistic and affective features with unigram representations improves classification performance. The best macro F1-scores achieved across the subtasks range from 0.72 to 0.82.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.