Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41880288›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Social support detection from social media texts.

Zahra Ahani, Moein Shahiki Tash, Fazlourrahman Balouchzahi, Luis Ramos, Grigori Sidorov, Alexander Gelbukh, Rau L Monroy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zahra AhaniInstituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Centro de Investigación en Computación (CIC), Mexico City, Mexico.
Moein Shahiki TashInstituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Centro de Investigación en Computación (CIC), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5767-0566
Fazlourrahman BalouchzahiInstituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Centro de Investigación en Computación (CIC), Mexico City, Mexico.
Luis RamosInstituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Centro de Investigación en Computación (CIC), Mexico City, Mexico.
Grigori SidorovInstituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Centro de Investigación en Computación (CIC), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3901-3522
Alexander GelbukhInstituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Centro de Investigación en Computación (CIC), Mexico City, Mexico.
Rau L MonroyTecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingenieria y Ciencias, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3465-995X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social support, conveyed through a multitude of interactions and platforms such as social media, plays a pivotal role in fostering a sense of belonging, aiding resilience in the face of challenges, and enhancing overall well-being. This paper introduces Social Support Detection (SSD) as a Natural Language Processing (NLP) task aimed at identifying supportive interactions within online communities. We define SSD through three subtasks: (1) binary classification of whether a comment expresses social support or not social support, (2) binary classification of the intended support target (individual or group), and (3) multiclass classification of the specific group being supported, including Nation, Other, LGBTQ, Black Community, Religion, and Women. We conducted experiments on a manually annotated dataset of 9,998 YouTube comments. Traditional machine learning models were employed using various combinations of linguistic, psycholinguistic, emotional, and sentiment-based features. Additionally, neural network-based models incorporating word embeddings were evaluated to enhance performance across the subtasks. The results indicate a prevalence of group-oriented support in online discourse, highlighting broader societal dynamics. The findings show that integrating psycholinguistic and affective features with unigram representations improves classification performance. The best macro F1-scores achieved across the subtasks range from 0.72 to 0.82.

Indexed as

Social MediaSocial SupportHumansMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingNeural Networks, ComputerPsycholinguisticsSocial Group

Identifiers

PMID41880288
PMCPMC13016356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.