ArticlePloS one2026
Surname match/mismatch revisited: It may no longer matter for partner choice.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kin recognition plays a crucial role in mating across various biological taxa, including bacteria, plants, and animals, to prevent inbreeding. Historically, surnames have been indicators of kinship in humans, with many countries enforcing laws and norms to prohibit marriages between individuals sharing the same surname in the past. Here, considering the potentially adaptive role of surname mismatch in inbreeding avoidance, we address whether surnames can still influence partner choice in modern human society, where same-surname marriages are no longer prohibited, by utilizing nation-wide name databases from Taiwan. Analysis of data from 2018 revealed a lower frequency of same-surname marriages than expected, reflecting historical taboos against such marriages. However, this pattern was not observed in the 2023 data, suggesting a potential shift in people's attitudes over time. To further interpret this trend, we conducted a simple questionnaire survey among university students, which showed no significant correlation between surname coincidence and attractiveness ratings of heterosexual face images, in contrast to the traditional custom. Our results, although preliminary, suggest the hypothesis that the significance of surname match/mismatch in partner choice may have diminished, potentially due to rapidly changing socio-cultural environments. Further research into the shifting role of surnames is necessary to gain a deeper understanding of human social behaviors across different regions and contexts amidst modernization and globalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.