ArticleBone & joint research2026
Biomechanical properties of a new 3D-printed customized anatomical total wrist prosthesis : a quasi-dynamic finite element analysis.
Article in Bone & joint research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Current total wrist prostheses have defects, and their design requires further refinement. Therefore, we designed a novel customized anatomical total wrist prosthesis (CATWP) using 3D printing techniques, and evaluated its biomechanical properties. Methods: The 3D wrist joint model and the models of the CATWP and Universal2 prosthesis were established based on biomechanical finite element analysis. The mechanical structure, stress distribution, joint surface contact patterns, and centre of rotation (COR) were compared between the designed prosthesis, Universal2 prosthesis, and a normal wrist joint. Results: Compared with the Universal2 prosthesis, the CATWP effectively reduced the stress of the prosthesis (carpal platform and screws: maximum (Max), 65.27 MPa; radial shank: Max, 2.09 MPa) and the adjacent bone tissue (carpal bones: Max, 33.84 MPa), with a more uniform distribution. The contact stress curve of the distal/proximal joint surface became more stable during the ulnar-radial deviation movements than the Universal2 prosthesis (distal: Max, 13.47 MPa; proximal: Max, 16.42 MPa). The COR was located near the curvature centre of the prosthesis. Compared with the Universal2 prosthesis, the displacement fluctuation of the COR was effectively reduced by CATWP. Conclusion: The CATWP may outperform the Universal2 prosthesis in terms of restoring comprehensive wrist joint mobility and achieving a more uniform stress load distribution. However, further studies are required to confirm these findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.