ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Evaluation of the clinical validity of fixation accuracy using an open-face black mask in head stereotactic radiotherapy.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), precise alignment is crucial for treatment effectiveness and safety and has traditionally been achieved using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Recently, radiation-free optimal surface imaging (OSI) systems have gained popularity. Notably, the effectiveness of black face masks for identifying facial surfaces during OSI use has been increasingly reported. This study aimed to determine whether the fixation accuracy of an open-face black mask designed to facilitate detection using the OSI system is clinically acceptable. This study was approved by the institutional review board (protocol code E23-0162) on May 27th, 2023. We analyzed the accuracy and correlation of CBCT- and OSI-based measurements before and after treatment in 20 patients who underwent SRT using open-face black mask fixation. Additionally, intra-fractional motion was monitored in real time using the OSI system. Mean translational deviations measured by CBCT and OSI were 0.1 mm and 0.1 mm (lateral), -0.2 mm and 0.1 mm (longitudinal), and − 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm (vertical), respectively. Mean rotational deviations were 0.1° and − 0.1° (rotation), -0.4° and − 0.1° (roll), and 0.1° and − 0.1° (pitch). All measurements met clinical accuracy criteria. Weak correlations between CBCT and OSI data were observed only in the lateral and roll directions. Several transient outliers were noted in real-time OSI monitoring. The fixation accuracy achieved with the open-face black mask was within clinically acceptable limits based on both CBCT and OSI measurements. Further research is warranted to clarify the source of noise and improve the reliability of real-time OSI-based monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.