Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41880110›Full record

ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2026

Updated Expectations are Needed for Masked Priming Experiments: Commentary on Tsikandilakis et al. (2025).

Gary D Fisk

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gary D FiskDepartment of Psychology and Sociology, Georgia Southwestern State University, 800 GSW Drive, Americus, GA, 31709, USA. gary.fisk@gsw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-0713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Masking priming research into unconscious perception has a long history of ambiguous findings and controversies. Tsikandilakis and colleagues (2025) offer several commendable methodology recommendations that might resolve ambiguities and lead to compelling findings. However, better methodology might be insufficient to fully address the weaknesses of the null awareness paradigm. The expected experimental outcomes originate from decades-old models of perception and consciousness that are oversimplistic and obsolete. A re-orientation is needed. Given that perception, cognition, and emotion are the products of network functions, we should expect that perception and consciousness will have a graded continuum, dependent relationship for near-threshold stimuli. Methodology improvements are welcome, but updated expectations for experimental outcomes will also be needed to advance unconscious perception research.

Indexed as

AwarenessConsciousnessPerceptual MaskingUnconscious, PsychologyHumansAffective primacy hypothesisCognitive unconsciousConsciousnessEmotionMasked primingMaskingStandard hypothesisUnconscious perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.