Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41880106›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026

Semi-continuous non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring via automated optic nerve sheath diameter image acquisition and analysis: a benchtop proof-of-concept study.

Ahmed Kashkoush, Sean Li, Mohamed El-Abtah, Mark Bain, Joao Gomes, Scott Raymond

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmed KashkoushDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Cerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. kashkoa@ccf.org.
Sean LiCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mohamed El-AbtahDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Cerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Mark BainDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Cerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Joao GomesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Cerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Scott RaymondDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Cerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInvasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is associated with up to a 17% complication rate. There are no clinically accepted non-invasive, continuous ICP monitors. Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) has a high diagnostic accuracy for invasive ICPs; however, it only provides information at a point in time. We aimed to build a system for non-invasive automated ONSD image acquisition as a proxy for semi-continuous ICP monitoring.

methodsWe built a frame-based system attachable to a patient's head for robotic ONSD acquisition, termed ICP goggles. Phantom optic nerve sheaths filled with gel were constructed in 5-, 8-, and 11-mm diameters to be interchanged in a skull model orbit. Twenty trials of ICP goggle ONSD measurements were performed for each phantom nerve sheath size and compared to manual measurements using a Pearson's correlation coefficient. Intra-rater reliability of the automated system was evaluated using an intra-class correlation coefficient. A one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test was used to evaluate the classification accuracy of the ICP goggle measurements for each phantom size.

resultsSixty total trials were performed across the three phantom optic nerve sheath sizes. Mean ICP goggle measured ONSDs correlated with manual measurements (R

conclusionWe demonstrate a proof-of-concept model with validation data for automated ONSD image acquisition. These results validate mechanical performance and measurement consistency, but do not establish clinical-grade interpretation or robustness to real-world artifacts (e.g., motion, eyelids, and speckle) or anatomically accurate localization. Future work will focus on realistic globe-orbit phantoms, improved segmentation, coupling strategy, and staged human feasibility testing.

Indexed as

Intracranial PressureOptic NerveEquipment DesignHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicPhantoms, ImagingProof of Concept StudyReproducibility of ResultsAnatomic modelsIntracranial pressureOptic nerveRoboticsUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.