ReviewInternational journal of bipolar disorders2026
Vitamin D and calcium metabolism in bipolar disorder: a scoping review of contradictory evidence.
Review in International journal of bipolar disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis scoping review synthesized evidence on vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and serum calcium in bipolar disorder (BD) to evaluate their potential clinical utility.
methodsA systematic PubMed search identified original studies examining calcium metabolism biomarkers (vitamin D, PTH, serum calcium) exclusively in BD populations. Findings were synthesized narratively due to substantial methodological heterogeneity.
resultsFourteen studies met inclusion criteria, with small sample sizes (median n = 55) and predominantly cross-sectional designs. Vitamin D comparisons between BD patients and controls yielded contradictory results: three studies reported significantly lower levels in BD patients, two found significantly higher levels, and three found no differences. Vitamin D deficiency definitions varied widely (< 25 to < 50 nmol/L), precluding meaningful comparisons. Four cognition studies showed inconsistent associations with vitamin D, with negative correlations, age-dependent effects, or no associations reported. Two small vitamin D supplementation studies in bipolar spectrum disorders yielded contradictory results in distinct populations, with one in youth and the other in adults. Data on PTH and calcium were sparse and inconsistent. LIMITATIONS: Study limitations included a single database search, substantial study heterogeneity, and inadequate control for confounders, including seasonal variation.
conclusionsEvidence on calcium metabolism biomarkers in BD is contradictory and methodologically limited. Fundamental inconsistencies in vitamin D status between BD patients and controls, combined with conflicting supplementation data, preclude clinical recommendations. Routine vitamin D screening specifically for BD management cannot be supported. Large-scale, standardized studies are needed before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.