ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
An age-related computational framework for predicting tibial fracture healing under walking rehabilitation: a comparison between younger and older adults.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of muscle atrophy on fracture healing: insights from a tibial musculoskeletal-finite element model.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical factors regulate tissue differentiation during fracture healing. However, how age-related differences in gait kinematics, muscle forces, and bone microarchitecture modulate local biomechanical microenvironment remains unclear. We developed an age-related computational framework to link musculoskeletal loading during partial weight-bearing (PWB) walking to a mechanoregulation-based tibial fracture healing model. Open-source biomechanical datasets of younger (21 – 30 years) and older adults (61 – 84 years) were conducted to simulate muscle and joint forces by the developed age-related musculoskeletal model PWB walking rehabilitation. These forces were sampled and inserted into an age-related fracture healing model. The healing outcomes were systematically evaluated by computing the probability of success (PoS) of endochondral ossification and vascularization. Results demonstrated that the timing and intensity of peak mechanical stimulation varied by age groups. The linear relationships between age-related joint forces and mechanical stimulation suggest that older adults are more prone to fracture non-union and ruptured blood vessels. To achieve optimal healing, older adults require longer postoperative recovery periods before initiating PWB rehabilitation exercises. However, neovascularisation is highly sensitive to weight-bearing regardless of age. This study provides a transferable framework for testing postoperative protocols in computational simulations, highlighting the need for age-related rehabilitation strategies to optimize fracture healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41880057What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.