Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Efficacy of oral sucrose for preterm infants undergoing point-of-care lung ultrasound: a randomized assessor-blinded controlled trial.
Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05717088 (Effectiveness of Oral Sucrose for Preterm Infants Undergoing Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of Oral Sucrose for Preterm Infants Undergoing Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although lung ultrasound (LUS) is considered non-invasive in nature, handling and probe pressure may provoke pain and transient physiological changes in preterm infants. The aim of this study was to determine whether oral sucrose combined with a pacifier reduces procedural pain and stress in preterm infants undergoing bedside LUS. A two-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted between November 2020 and January 2023. Preterm infants undergoing LUS were randomized to receive either oral sucrose-plus-pacifier or pacifier-alone, administered 2 min before the scan. Pain was evaluated using the premature infant pain profile (PIPP) at four time points: baseline (30 s before intervention), 30 s into scanning, midpoint of the scan, and 30 s post-procedure. Physiological parameters (heart rate, oxygen saturation, and apneic episodes) and duration of the procedure were recorded. Group differences in PIPP scores were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Out of 60 infants enrolled, 30 infants were randomized in each group with data available on 29 infants in the sucrose-plus-pacifier group and 27 in the pacifier-alone group. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. No statistically significant differences were observed in PIPP scores and physiological parameters at any time point between groups. Repeated-measures ANOVA showed a significant change in PIPP scores across procedural phases (p < 0.0001), with no differences between groups (p = 0.16) or group-by-phase interaction, indicating similar PIPP score trajectories in both groups (p = 0.21). Conclusion: Among preterm infants, sucrose did not add benefit to pacifier-alone for reducing procedural pain and stress during lung ultrasound.Trial registration: NCT05717088. What is Known • Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a bedside, radiation-free imaging modality increasingly used in preterm infants, but probe pressure and handling may still provoke mild procedural discomfort and physiological changes. • Oral sucrose is an established non-pharmacologic analgesic for painful neonatal procedures; however, its benefit during minimally invasive procedures such as LUS remains uncertain. What is New • In this randomized controlled trial, oral sucrose did not provide additional analgesic benefit beyond pacifier use alone during bedside LUS in preterm infants. • These findings suggest that non-nutritive sucking alone may be sufficient for comfort during LUS, supporting its classification as a minimally distressing neonatal bedside procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41880043What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.