ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Plasma brain-derived p-tau217 for the identification of amyloid status in a memory clinic cohort.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Factors Associated With Discordant Plasma P-Tau217 and Established Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers.Neurology · 2026Article
- Profiling circulating Tau and phospho-Tau isoforms in pediatric and adult spinal muscular atrophy identifies selective elevation of pTau-262 in adults.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- From amyloid PET to plasma biomarkers: A multimodal imaging framework for early diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
41880042What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.