ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Application of machine learning algorithms to predict and assess factors related to internal carotid siphon aneurysm occlusion treated with flow diversion.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNumerous clinical indicators have been identified as risk factors for aneurysm occlusion and used to development of various Flow Diversion Predictive Score grading scales. The objective of this study is to predict and assess factors related to Internal carotid siphon aneurysm occlusion, by leveraging Machine Learning(ML) Algorithms.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated with flow diversion from January 2020 to December 2023 in our department. The samples were randomly divided into derivation and validation groups in a 70/30 ratio. We employed six ML algorithms, including LR, DT, SVM, RF, GBM, and XGBoost, these algorithms were utilized alongside preoperative and intraoperative clinicopathological characteristics to develop predictive models.
resultsA total of 297 patients with 342 target aneurysms were included. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified aneurysm orientation, W, BNF, IA, incorporated branch vessels, and adjunct coil deployment as independent predictors. Additionally, a random forest feature selection analysis was conducted to identify potentially significant factors based on importance scores, IA performed the most outstandingly. Combining with previously reported literature, we ultimately determined the variables for inclusion in six ML models: IA, BNF, incorporated branch vessels, adjunct coil deployment, ostium area, CND, NR, and Dmax. Among these models, the GBM showed superior performance with an AUROC of 0.766.
conclusionBy integrating preoperative and intraoperative factors, ML algorithms can achieve acceptable predictions. If widely implemented, this approach could serve as a valuable reference for selecting surgical methods for specific aneurysms prior to operation in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.