Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41879970›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2026

[Special ethical aspects in older intensive care patients].

Jochen Dutzmann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jochen DutzmannKlinik für Innere Medizin III., Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland. jochen.dutzmann@uk-halle.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With demographic shifts, the proportion of older and very old patients in intensive care units is steadily rising. These patients vary widely in their functional reserves and treatment prospects. Multimorbidity, frailty, and impaired decision-making capacity are prevalent, while advance directives are often unclear or outdated. Consequently, determining the appropriate treatment, establishing the patient's wishes, and defining realistic treatment goals present significant challenges. Chronological age alone is a poor predictor of mortality and functional outcomes. Frailty, functional reserve, and the dynamics of the acute illness are far more decisive factors. However, prognostic uncertainty remains substantial. Given the increasing power and high cost of intensive care medicine, necessary political and clinical decisions on resource allocation must never be based solely on chronological age.

Indexed as

Critical CareEthics, MedicalAdvance DirectivesAgedAged, 80 and overFrail ElderlyGermanyHumansIntensive Care UnitsMultimorbidityPrognosisAgedCritical careDecision makingEthicsPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.