ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Outcomes of Risankizumab in Patients with Crohn's Disease and Prior Ustekinumab Exposure in a Multicenter Academic Institution.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acceptability and tolerability of risankizumab maintenance therapy administered via on-body injector in patients with Crohn's disease: Results of the ACCEPT-OBI study.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRisankizumab (RZB) and ustekinumab (UST) are interleukin inhibitors that are used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD). Data on outcomes of RZB in patients previously treated with UST are limited. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of RZB in patients previously exposed to UST.
methodsThis retrospective study included adult patients with CD who were prescribed RZB and had prior UST exposure at a multicenter academic institution between 1/2022 and 8/2024. We extracted demographic, CD-related, and medication-related data, as well as subjective and objective endpoints while on UST and RZB. Fisher's exact test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used in the analysis.
resultsAmong 68 patients treated with RZB and prior UST therapy, 43 (63.2%) experienced symptomatic improvement on RZB, 57 (83.8%) avoided surgery, and 12 of 25 patients on steroids (48%) achieved steroid-free remission. Average C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, and endoscopic scores decreased on RZB compared with UST. A higher number of previous CD medications was associated with a lack of improvement on RZB (p = 0.011). Secondary nonresponse to UST was significantly associated with improvement on RZB (p = 0.047). No difference in RZB response was observed between patients maintained on standard UST dosing and those who underwent dose escalation (p = 0.557).
conclusionsRZB appears to be an effective treatment option for patients with CD and prior UST use, particularly those with secondary loss of response. A higher number of previously trialed therapies was associated with reduced likelihood of response, underscoring the importance of early, strategic treatment sequencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41879951What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.