ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026
Personalized prediction of initial valproic acid dose in children with epilepsy using machine learning techniques.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionValproic acid (VPA) is widely prescribed antiepileptic drug in children because of its broad-spectrum efficacy. However, marked inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetics makes dose optimization challenging. Inappropriate initial dosing can lead to subtherapeutic exposure or toxicity, including hepatotoxicity, encephalopathy, and hematological adverse effects. Despite the importance of early dose selection, reliable methods for predicting individualized initial daily doses of VPA in pediatric epilepsy are lacking.
aimThis study aimed to develop and internally validate a predictive model for the initial daily dose of VPA in pediatric epilepsy patients based on a real-world clinical database using artificial intelligence techniques.
methodA retrospective cohort of pediatric epilepsy patients treated with VPA was recruited from Baoding Children's Hospital between December 2017 and November 2023. Eligible patients were aged 1-16 years, received oral VPA therapy, and underwent therapeutic drug monitoring. Data pre-processing included z-score standardization, one-hot encoding, and Random Forest imputation for missing values. Variable selection was performed by univariate analysis and sequential forward selection. The dataset (306 VPA dose samples from 184 patients) was randomly divided into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets. Ten machine learning and deep learning algorithms-CatBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Multilayer Perceptron, Artificial Neural Network, Transformer, AdaBoost, and TabNet-were trained with tenfold cross-validation. The model performance was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE).
resultsAge, weight, total protein, creatinine, and lactate dehydrogenase were the five most influential predictors of initial daily VPA dose. Among all the models, the TabNet algorithm achieved the best predictive performance, with R
conclusionThe TabNet-based model demonstrated strong predictive ability for estimating individualized initial VPA doses in pediatric epilepsy in a single-center cohort with internal validation only. By integrating readily available demographic and laboratory parameters, the model and its accompanying online tool have the potential to offer a practical decision-support resource for clinicians and pharmacists to improve dosing precision, enhance safety, and optimize therapeutic outcomes; however, the generalizability of this internally validated model to other hospitals, populations, and ethnic groups is unknown, and external validation is required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.