ReviewAdvances in therapy2026
Factor XI Inhibitors in Atrial Fibrillation: Insights and Implications from Recent Trials.
Review in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke prevention remains a cornerstone of the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) given the increased risk of thromboembolic events. While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have significantly advanced stroke prophylaxis in AF, bleeding risks remain a challenge and preclude use in some populations. Furthermore, evidence indicates significant undertreatment in AF, with up to 40% of patients receiving incorrect anticoagulant dosing or no anticoagulation at all, further elevating their stroke risk. Novel anticoagulants targeting factor (F)XI are emerging as a promising alternative, offering the potential to reduce thromboembolic events whilst minimizing bleeding risks. Inhibitors under development include small molecules, monoclonal antibodies, and antisense oligonucleotides. These agents have demonstrated favorable safety profiles when compared to DOACs in early phase and some late phase trials. For example abelacimab, an anti-FXI monoclonal antibody, demonstrated superior safety with lower bleeding rates when compared to rivaroxaban in patients with AF. However, the efficacy of these drugs remains uncertain. However, the OCEANIC-AF trial, which studied the small molecule FXI inhibitor asundexian, was terminated early due to lack of efficacy as there was an increased rate of stroke and systematic embolism compared to the DOAC apixaban, raising new concerns about the utility of targeting FXI. However, many FXI inhibitors are currently undergoing phase 3 trials, and as such the true efficacy of the full class of FXI inhibitors remains to be elucidated. This review aims to provide a comprehensive synopsis of the landscape of FXI inhibitors in development for AF, their advantages, challenges, and known utility with a focus on how they may be applied to future anticoagulation therapy for AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.