ReviewJournal of molecular modeling2026
Synthetic advances, pharmacological prospects, and molecular insights of spirooxindoles: a comprehensive review.
Review in Journal of molecular modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextSpirooxindoles represent a distinguished category in medicinal chemistry. Their three-dimensional structure enhances interactions with many biological targets. They exhibit anticancer, antibacterial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antidiabetic properties. Various methods were applied to synthesize spirooxindoles and their derivatives. This review focuses on different synthetic approaches, pharmacological activities, and molecular insights of spirooxindoles that have been published in the first quarter of the twenty-first century. Furthermore, research gaps were highlighted, such as the lack of in vivo validation, toxicity profiling, and standardized yield/replicability data. Twelve synthesis procedures were statistically compared. A total of 40 studies were pharmacologically summarized, and their molecular insights were highlighted.
methodsThe method of literature search engines and citation databases such as Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was utilized for the present review and searching for specific research questions. Then each of the transformed queries has been processed by running the applied inclusion & exclusion criteria in order to retrieve a focused set of candidate papers, and 219 papers were retrieved. Out of the total retrieved papers, 99 of them were mostly relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41879882What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.