Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41879866›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2026

Filth Flies, Flowers and Food: Pollination by Flies (Calliphoridae) Does Not Affect the Strawberry Microbiome.

Jonathan T D Finch, Markus Riegler, James M Cook, Laura E Brettell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan T D FinchHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia. jonathan.finch@utas.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-0308
Markus RieglerHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7363-431X
James M CookHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8447-6126
Laura E BrettellHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia. l.e.brettell1@salford.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6050-4804

Funding

Horticultural Innovation Australia Limited PH16002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blow flies can be used as alternative pollinators to honeybees for several crops. However, they can potentially vector harmful bacteria to surfaces on which they land. Therefore, there is a risk that blow flies may contaminate flowers, and thereby fruit, with human pathogens. Growers, supermarkets and consumers may therefore have concerns about food safety. To address these concerns, we asked: (1) do fly visits result in altered bacterial communities on flowers, and if so, (2) do these altered communities persist to the fruit stage? We exposed strawberry flowers to “clean” blow flies and flies that had contacted a common environmental contaminant (cow manure). Using a 16 S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing approach, we evaluated the impact of the blow fly visits on the flower and fruit microbiomes. We found that the fruit microbiome was not impacted by our treatments, specifically, no shared amplicon sequence variants were found in both the manure and the resulting fruit that developed after pollination by a manure-exposed fly. This suggests that fly pollination is unlikely to pose a risk to human health. Our study may help to alleviate concerns from growers and consumers of using flies as managed pollinators in the agrifood system.

Indexed as

BacteriaCalliphoridaeFlowersFragariaMicrobiotaPollinationAnimalsFruitManureRNA, Ribosomal, 16SManureRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16SBlow flyenvironmentflowerfruitmicrobiomestrawberry

Identifiers

PMID41879866
PMCPMC13053414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.