Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41879862›Full record

ReviewThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2026

Acute management of spinal fractures: What you need to know.

Michel Paul Johan Teuben, Anna Veenstra, Hans-Christoph Pape, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michel Paul Johan TeubenORCID 0000-0003-0310-4668
Anna Veenstra
Hans-Christoph Pape
Zurich, Switzerland

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractSpinal injuries occur frequently and influence the diagnosis and treatment of concurrent traumatic conditions. Understanding of spinal trauma patterns, clinical assessment and documentation, imaging options, and classification systems is essential for making multidisciplinary treatment decisions. The initial evaluation focuses on identifying neurological deficits, assessing mechanical stability, and recognizing red-flag symptoms requiring urgent intervention. Furthermore, essential concurrent nonspinal injuries, as well as multiple spinal fractures, should be ruled out. Whole-body or whole-spine CT is the cornerstone of imaging, while magnetic resonance imaging is reserved for evaluating ligamentous injury, disc pathology, and spinal cord involvement. Internationally recognized classification systems form the basis for treatment decisions. In isolated spinal trauma, early stabilization facilitates mobilization and may improve neurological outcomes, particularly when early decompression is performed in patients with spinal cord injury. In polytrauma, however, spinal surgery must be balanced against life-threatening conditions and physiological instability. Early mobilization, respiratory support, hemodynamic optimization, and thromboprophylaxis remain critical components of postoperative care. ( J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2026;100:850-862.

Indexed as

Spinal FracturesDecompression, SurgicalHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple TraumaTomography, X-Ray ComputedPolytraumaspine diagnosticsspine surgeryspine trauma

Identifiers

PMID41879862
PMCPMC13200875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.