ArticleJournal of proteome research2026
Impact of Variations in Commercial Standard Operating Procedure on Plasma Proteome Recovery.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancements in mass spectrometry and complementary technologies now enable comprehensive, high-resolution plasma proteomics. Plasma is a key biofluid for clinical research, harboring potential disease-informative biomarkers. Commercial sources of nondiseased, healthy donor plasma samples are often used for proteomic workflow development and as controls for clinical studies. The overarching assumption is that standard operating procedures for plasma preparation are comparable across different sources. In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of a particle-based protein enrichment strategy against a conventional proteomics workflow on plasma samples from five commonly used commercial sources. We aimed to characterize the extent of variability in plasma proteomes when factors such as freeze-thaw cycles, choice of anticoagulant, and operator-to-operator performance were accounted for in the study setup. Plasma samples were analyzed in data-independent acquisition mode by using two distinct instruments (Exploris 480, timsTOF HT) and search algorithms (CHIMERYS, DIA-NN). Plasma proteome enrichment yields ranged from 2.8- to 6.2-fold more compared to the conventional workflow, achieving yields exceeding 5000 proteins (timsTOF HT). Notably, the observed variability in proteome composition was largely attributable to differences in whole blood-to-plasma operating procedures across commercial sources. While these distinct proteomes remained undetectable with conventional workflows, particle-dependent proteome profiling successfully revealed the procedural differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.