Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41879781›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Shifts in Antipsychotic Prescribing by Clinician Type for Medicare Part D Beneficiaries, 2013-2023.

Youngran Kim, Xuan Zhou, Shilei Du, Trudy M Krause, Rafael Samper-Ternent, Antonio L Teixeira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Youngran KimDepartment of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Xuan ZhouCenter for Health Care Data, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Shilei DuCenter for Health Care Data, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Trudy M KrauseDepartment of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Rafael Samper-TernentDepartment of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Antonio L TeixeiraThe Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's & Neurodegenerative Diseases, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Despite safety warnings, antipsychotics remain commonly prescribed to older adults, particularly those with dementia, and for off-label indications. However, little is known about how prescribing patterns vary by clinician type over time. Objective: To examine trends in antipsychotic prescribing by clinician type among Medicare beneficiaries from 2013 to 2023. Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional study used the Medicare Part D Prescribers by Provider and Drug dataset from 2013 to 2023. Participants included Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Part D. Analyses were performed between November 2024 and June 2025. Exposure: Prescribing clinician type, categorized as psychiatrist, primary care physician (PCP), advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) or physician assistant (PA), or other physician. Main Outcomes and Measures: Annual antipsychotic prescription claims, the proportion of claims by clinician type, the number of prescribing clinicians, and the mean number of claims per clinician. Results: From 2013 to 2023, annual antipsychotic prescription claims decreased from 10.8 million to 7.8 million for psychiatrists (average annual percentage change [AAPC], -3.2% [95% CI, -3.7% to -2.7%]; P < .001) and from 7.4 million to 5.7 million for PCPs (AAPC, -2.6% [95% CI, -3.2% to -2.3%]; P < .001). In contrast, claims prescribed by APRNs or PAs more than tripled from 2013 to 2023, increasing from 3.1 million to 9.5 million (AAPC, 11.8% [95% CI, 10.9%-12.7%]; P < .001). The proportion of prescriptions decreased for psychiatrists (48.4% to 32.4%) and PCPs (33.0% to 23.8%) but increased for APRNs and PAs (13.8% to 39.6%) from 2013 to 2023. These shifts were associated primarily with the expanding number of prescribing APRNs and PAs rather than an increase in the mean number of claims per clinician. Although trends were observed in both rural and urban areas, rural areas experienced larger shifts from PCPs to APRNs and PAs, whereas urban areas experienced larger shifts from psychiatrists to APRNs and PAs. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of Medicare Part D data from 2013 to 2023, antipsychotic prescribing shifted from psychiatrists and PCPs to APRNs and PAs, reflecting growth in nonphysician prescribers. These findings suggest evolving roles in antipsychotic medication management and highlight the need for appropriate training for the full range of clinician types who prescribe these medications to Medicare enrollees.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsDrug PrescriptionsMedicare Part DPractice Patterns, Physicians'AgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePhysician AssistantsPsychiatristsUnited StatesAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID41879781
PMCPMC13019238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.