ArticleBlood advances2026
Real-world experience with tabelecleucel within and beyond the approval label.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-world experience with tabelecleucel.Blood advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractTabelecleucel (tab-cel) is an allogeneic Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific T-cell therapy approved in the European Union for relapsed or refractory (R/R) EBV-associated posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) after rituximab or immunochemotherapy failure. Despite its promise as the first approved option for treating the disorder, real-world evidence remains limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the scope of use and outcomes of tab-cel treatment in the real-world setting across Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Eleven patients with EBV+ PTLD or other EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD) from 9 academic centers were included for a detailed analysis of baseline characteristics and survival parameters. Of these, 8 patients with PTLD (6 after solid organ transplantation and 2 after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation) and 3 patients with EBV-associated LPDs were treated with a median of 2 cycles of tab-cel (range, 1-3). After a median follow-up of 15.1 months, 6 of 11 (55%) patients remained alive. Initially, 7 of 11 patients (64%) achieved an objective response, with best response occurring at a median of 31 days after the first tab-cel infusion (ie, end of cycle 1). Relapse and progression after tab-cel occurred in 7 of 11 (64%) patients. The estimated median overall survival was 13.4 months (confidence interval, 4.4-14.7), likely because of successful subsequent salvage treatments. Immunotherapy-related adverse events were rare. Tab-cel showed efficacy and low toxicity in patients with R/R PTLD/LPD, a vulnerable cohort of immunodeficient or patient who underwent transplantations. These real-world data help elucidate the optimal integration of tab-cel in the management of R/R PTLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.