ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2026
Data Mining Strategies for Understanding Birth Patterns in Dairy Cattle: Single and Multiple Birth Analysis.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data mining is a robust methodology designed to predict feature performance, identify trends within datasets, classify data based on similarities and optimize resource allocation. In the context of dairy farming, multiple birth is generally regarded as an undesirable outcome due to its adverse effects on cow fertility rates and the health of multiple calves, ultimately impacting farm profitability. This study conducts a comprehensive evaluation of various machine learning algorithms for the classification of multiple birth data using the Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) platform. The performance of 21 algorithms was evaluated using multiple metrics, including mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), Kappa statistic, classification accuracy and computational time. The results reveal significant variability in the performance of the algorithms. Notably, the radial basis function (RBF) and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms outperformed others, achieving the lowest MAE and RMSE values, along with the highest Kappa statistics and classification accuracy on both training and test datasets. Specifically, the RBF model achieved a perfect Kappa statistic of 1 on the training set, indicating flawless agreement between predicted and actual classifications. In contrast, algorithms such as Voted Perceptron and Simple Cart exhibited higher error rates and lower classification accuracy, rendering them less suitable for this task. The analysis also highlighted trade-offs between accuracy and computational efficiency, with algorithms like K-nearest neighbours (KNN) and Random Forest providing a balanced performance. These findings emphasize the critical importance of selecting appropriate algorithms and evaluation metrics to achieve robust and reliable classification outcomes in multiple birth data analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.