ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2026
Single Centre Review of Hysterectomy by Abdominal Laparoscopy and Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery.
Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is a novel minimally invasive surgical technique that can be used for hysterectomy. The technique combines the advantages of vaginal hysterectomy, such as shorter operating times and recovery, with the benefits of laparoscopy.
aimsThe aim of this study is to describe and compare patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and outcomes for total laparoscopic (TLH) and vaginal assisted NOTES hysterectomy (VANH). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of all VANH surgeries performed by a single surgeon over a two-year period at Caboolture Hospital in Queensland, Australia. Procedural steps and peri-operative care were standardised and for comparison patients were grouped by procedure type.
resultsThe study sample comprised 150 cases evenly divided between TLH and VANH. On average, VANH was a faster procedure, with higher median blood loss. There was no significant difference in analgesia requirements and there was a trend toward shorter hospital stay. VANH was more often associated with vaginal repair or sacrospinous fixation, and this patient group had the highest blood loss, duration of surgery, and length of stay. There was no significant difference in complications.
conclusionsWith careful patient selection and suitable training, the risks are comparable with TLH and VANH. The benefits are higher for specific patients and the surgical approach at time of hysterectomy should be individualised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.