ArticleEcology2026
Social cues from neighboring patches influence patch dynamics in a spatially structured population of a colonial bird.
Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The dynamics of spatially structured populations (SSPs) depend on dispersal movements between habitat patches. Individual-level studies show that dispersal can be informed by social cues about habitat quality, such as breeding success or the number of conspecifics in a patch. However, informed dispersal has rarely been considered in studies investigating SSP dynamics. In particular, little is known about how patch dynamics are influenced by characteristics of neighboring patches, and the spatial scale of this influence. Here, we used occupancy and growth rate models to investigate the effect of breeding success and numbers in all patches of an SSP of black-headed gulls (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) on patch colonization, persistence and growth rates. The spatial scale of influence of neighboring patches was estimated using a distance decay function weighting the effect of patch covariates. Our results showed a strong influence of breeding success and breeding numbers, both in the focal patch and in neighboring patches, on patch dynamics. Persistence was higher for patches occupied by large and successful colonies, suggesting high attractiveness of such colonies, although their growth rate was reduced, probably due to increased costs of group-living. Patch colonization rates were higher within a few kilometers from patches occupied by large and successful colonies, in accordance with an attraction of dispersers to areas showing favorable breeding conditions. The breeding success of neighboring patches from the entire SSP reduced patch persistence, but only for patches that failed to produce chicks, and negatively affected the growth rate of persisting colonies, consistent with individuals moving away towards higher quality habitats. These results advocate for the use of social information in black-headed gull dispersal decisions. However, we were unable to distinguish between the use of breeding success (public information) and breeding numbers (conspecific attraction), which were highly correlated. Our findings emphasize the need to consider neighboring patches as dynamic components of the landscape that actively shape dispersal decisions, with consequences on SSP dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.