ReviewBioMed research international2026
Key Steps in Murine Cardiac Engineering Validation: How Does It Affect the Efficiency of Cardiac Devices?
Review in BioMed research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The 5% Problem: How the Biomedical Community Responded to the Animal-to-Human Translation Crisis, and the Case for Non-Animal Methods.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Key Steps in Murine Cardiac Engineering Validation: How Does It Affect the Efficiency of Cardiac Devices?BioMed research international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myocardial infarction is one of the leading causes of death in the world. Owing to the limited regenerative capacity of the heart, the development of therapeutic devices using cell therapy and tissue engineering has gained importance. Preclinical validation of these devices can provide evidence of their safety and efficacy in implantation in infarcted myocardium. In view of the growing number of proposed devices, it is necessary to establish an appropriate experimental protocol that mimics the clinical scenario. This review is aimed at describing the strategies used for the preclinical validation of an artificial myocardium, based on the purpose of the therapy and the experimental design. Overall, the development of cardiac devices has focused on in vitro or in situ strategies for cell delivery to the infarcted tissue and proper cell proliferation and differentiation. Efforts have also been made to search for new cell sources, blood vessel formation, development of an anti-inflammatory phenotype, and electromechanical coupling of resident and implanted cardiomyocytes. Based on the published evidence, a seven-stage process for the preclinical validation of cardiac regenerative therapy is proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.