Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878986›Full record

Trial reportPhysiological reports2026

A comparison of resting metabolic rate measurement in adults, using a ventilated canopy or a mixing-chamber system with a silicone mask.

Yair Pincu, F N U Sakshi, Grant A Chesbro, Akram Falahati, Rebecca D Larson

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yair PincuDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9412-2038
F N U SakshiDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Grant A ChesbroDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Akram FalahatiDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Rebecca D LarsonDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most common method for measuring resting metabolic rate (RMR) via indirect calorimetry (IC) is using a ventilated canopy system (canopy). Yet, many use a facemask (mask). The purpose of this study was to compare RMR using a canopy and a mask. RMR was measured in 26 participants using a canopy or a mask, followed immediately by the opposite mode in a randomized fashion. RMR was compared between the canopy and mask in males and females using a 2 × 2 repeated-measures ANOVA. Agreement between the 2 modes and typical error of measurement (TEM) were calculated. Data are mean ± SD. Resting VO

Indexed as

Basal MetabolismCalorimetry, IndirectMasksAdultFemaleHumansMaleOxygen Consumptionindirect calorimetrymetabolic carttotal daily energy expenditureventilated hood

Identifiers

PMID41878986
PMCPMC13098090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.