ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Machine-Learning Decomposition Identifies a Big Two Structure in Human Personality with Distinct Neurocognitive Profiles.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Personality neuroscience has traditionally relied on the Big Five model to investigate trait structure and its relationship to individual differences in brain organization and life outcomes. However, existing theoretical frameworks explain only part of the item-level covariance, raising questions about whether alternative factor solutions might complement the canonical five-factor model. Here, we applied an additive and part-based machine learning decomposition to a mega-scale, global dataset (n = 1,336,840) to systematically evaluate trait structure across factor resolutions. Beyond reproducing the canonical Big Five, we identified a robust Big Two comprising Social Adaptation and Spontaneous Mentation. Social Adaptation integrates covarying questionnaire items from Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness, indexing externally oriented social functioning. Spontaneous Mentation, in turn, aggregates Neuroticism with introspective facets of Openness, capturing internally directed affective-cognitive exploration. Embedding individuals in this Big Two space revealed structured manifolds along which neurocognitive profiles aligned with distinct trait orientations. Importantly, this lower-dimensional representation improved prediction of functional brain connectivity relative to Big Five scores, while preserving comparable associations with cognition and mental health. Together, these results establish a neurocognitively grounded Big Two framework that complements the Big Five and offers an interpretable bridge between personality structure, cognitive functioning, and psychopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.