ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition and Renal Outcome in Men and Women With Heart Failure.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSacubitril/valsartan is known to reduce adverse renal outcomes and slow the decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) compared with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors across the entire spectrum of heart failure. However, whether these renoprotective effects differ by sex has not been elucidated. Thus, we aimed to evaluate whether the treatment effect of sacubitril/valsartan versus RAS inhibitors on renal outcomes differs by sex.
methodsData sets from the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure; ejection fraction ≤40%, n=8399) and PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction; ejection fraction ≥45%, n=4796) trials were integrated in a prespecified pooled analysis. We evaluated the treatment effect (sacubitril/valsartan versus RAS inhibitors) on the prespecified renal composite outcome (death from renal failure, end-stage renal disease, or ≥50% reduction in eGFR) and changes in eGFR slope in female (n=4311) and male (n=8884) patients to determine whether sex modified the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on renal outcomes.
resultsAt baseline, women exhibited lower eGFR values than men (67.2±19.7 versus 72.6±20.4 mL/min/1.73 m
conclusionsSacubitril/valsartan significantly reduces the incidence of renal composite outcome and decelerates the decline in eGFR compared with RAS inhibitors. The renoprotective effects of this drug are uniformly observed in both women and men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.