SynthesisInternational health2026
Visual acuity outcome and complications of cataract surgery in Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study estimated the pooled prevalence of visual acuity (VA) outcomes and potentially blinding cataract surgery complications in Nigeria. Ethical clearance was waived by the Ethical Review Board of the Kano State Ministry of Health. We searched PubMed, African journals online, Embase, MEDLINE and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies from January 1990 to February 2025. Data on presenting and best-corrected visual acuities at ≥6 weeks after cataract surgery, intraoperative posterior capsular rupture with vitreous loss and postoperative endophthalmitis were extracted from included studies. I2 statistics were used to assess heterogeneity across studies. Articles were systematically reviewed and a random effects meta-analysis model was applied to estimate the pooled effect size across studies. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 17.0 software. Sixteen studies, with a total of 3631 cataract-operated eyes, were included in the review. A total of 80.0% of all operated eyes had a preoperative VA of <3/60. At ≥4 weeks the percentage with good presenting VA ranged from 8% to 86%, with evidence of improved outcomes over time (95% confidence interval [CI] 45.0 to 67.0, I2=96.7%). With the best correction, 75% (95% CI 66.0 to 83.0, I2=98%) had a good outcome at ≥6 weeks postoperatively. The pooled prevalence of posterior capsular ruptures with vitreous loss was 4.0%, while 1.0% had postoperative endophthalmitis. In this review, the VA outcome after cataract surgery in Nigeria is well below the World Health Organization-recommended benchmark of >90% for a good result, with a higher rate of potentially blinding complications. The findings of this review suggest the need for improvement in modern surgical techniques, quality biometry and stocking of intraocular lenses of different powers and types to improve visual outcome and reduce complication rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.