ArticleGenetics2026
The selective dynamics of interruptions at short tandem repeats.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A family portrait of the genomic factors shaping tandem repeat mutagenesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Short tandem repeats (STRs) are hotspots of genomic instability that mutate at rates orders of magnitude greater than nonrepetitive loci due to frequent replication slippage. Expansions at some STR loci cause Mendelian diseases, while variation at other noncoding loci may affect complex traits, possibly by altering transcription factor occupancy of nearby binding sites. Accordingly, some STRs are inferred to be under purifying selection, regardless of their instability. One or more "interruptions", or bases that disrupt the locus's canonical repeat, significantly decrease an STR's mutability. For example, the onset of Huntington's Disease, a neurodegenerative disorder associated with somatic expansions of a trinucleotide coding STR, is delayed in individuals whose inherited alleles contain interruptions. Thus, interruptions that decrease mutation rate at some coding loci may broadly protect against deleterious phenotypes associated with locus instability. However, interruptions may themselves be deleterious at constrained loci, particularly at noncoding loci in gene regulatory elements, possibly disrupting the formation of secondary structures key to their function. We therefore hypothesized that the frequency of interruptions could depend on a locus's functional importance-at constrained loci, the fitness effects of expansions but also interruptions could be more deleterious than at neutral loci. To test this hypothesis, we examined the distribution of interruptions at ∼650,000 autosomal STRs. In the ∼2,500 3- or 6bp-motif coding STRs, we find that synonymous interruption density increases with purifying selection on the gene, while the opposite is true for missense-causing interruptions. In contrast, noncoding STRs in gene regulatory elements harbor fewer interruptions than elements that are unassociated with gene regulation and thus more likely to be evolving neutrally. Our findings indicate that the abundance of interruptions may be partially explained at coding STRs by the benefit of lower instability, whereas maintaining a core stretch of uninterrupted repeat may be key to the function of regulatory noncoding STRs, outweighing the benefits of stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.