ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2026
A general framework for investigating neurodevelopment of brain functional networks using multisite and longitudinal neuroimaging.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years longitudinal, multi-site imaging studies have emerged as key tools for investigating brain function. These studies follow a large number of participants for an extended period, offering exciting opportunities to uncover brain functional network changes over time as a function of clinical and demographic covariates. However, these studies also introduce many statistical challenges such as site-effects and accounting for the heterogeneous nature of network differences between subjects. Robust statistical methods are highly needed to address these issues, but to date there has been little methods development addressing these problems in the context of data-driven brain network estimation. This work addresses this gap in the literature, introducing a general Bayesian framework, REMBRAiNDT, incorporating site- and subject-effects into the network decomposition, while also enabling covariate effect estimation and efficient information pooling across brain locations. We use our procedure to conduct a novel analysis of neurodevelopment among adolescents in the longitudinal, multi-site ABCD study. We find extensive evidence of increasing functional integration with age in networks associated with higher order cognitive processes. Our study is one of the first to examine neurodevelopment using blind source separation in the longitudinal ABCD study data, and the findings enrich earlier cross-sectional results on neurodevelopment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.