Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41878717›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026

Thread-Embedding versus Manual Acupuncture for Overactive Bladder in Postmenopausal Women: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Su-Ji Choi, Jang-Kyung Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Su-Ji ChoiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Korean Medicine, Dong-eui University, Busan-si, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6068-5270
Jang-Kyung ParkDepartment of Korean Medicine Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan-si, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition in older women, characterized by urinary urgency, frequency, and nocturia. This study compared the efficacy and safety of thread-embedding acupuncture (TEA) and sham TEA in postmenopausal women with OAB. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, 68 postmenopausal women with OAB were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive TEA or sham TEA (manual acupuncture without thread embedding) once weekly for 8 weeks, followed by an 8-week follow up. The primary outcome was the mean daily voiding frequency over 3 days. Secondary outcomes included other bladder diary parameters, the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), and the King's Health Questionnaire score. Results: At week 8, both groups showed reductions in 24-hour micturition frequency; however, after adjustment for baseline values using ANCOVA, no significant between-group difference was observed in the primary outcome. Repeated measures analysis demonstrated no significant group-by-time interactions for secondary outcomes, although significant improvements over time were observed in both groups. At follow-up, nighttime voiding remained significantly reduced from baseline in the TEA group, whereas this reduction was not statistically significant in the sham group; however, the between-group difference did not reach statistical significance. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: TEA and manual acupuncture were effective and safe in reducing OAB symptoms in postmenopausal women, with no significant differences between interventions. Larger, long-term studies are needed to clarify specific benefits of TEA.

Indexed as

acupuncturefrequent urinationmenopauseoveractive bladderquality of life

Identifiers

PMID41878717
PMCPMC13007670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.